Artículo
Autoría
TRENCH, JUAN MAXIMO
;
Olguin, Maria Valeria
;
MINERVINO, RICARDO ADRIAN
Fecha
2016
Editorial y Lugar de Edición
Psychology Press
Revista
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY,
vol. 69
(pp. 698-712)
Psychology Press
Resumen
Información suministrada por el agente en
SIGEVA
The present study tackles two overlooked aspects of analogical retrieval: (1) whether argumentation activities elicit a spontaneous search for analogical sources, and (2) whether strategic search can relax the superficial bias typically obtained in experimental studies of analogical retrieval. In Experiment 1, participants had to generate arguments for a target situation under three conditions: without indication to use analogies, with indication to use analogies, and with indication to search ...
The present study tackles two overlooked aspects of analogical retrieval: (1) whether argumentation activities elicit a spontaneous search for analogical sources, and (2) whether strategic search can relax the superficial bias typically obtained in experimental studies of analogical retrieval. In Experiment 1, participants had to generate arguments for a target situation under three conditions: without indication to use analogies, with indication to use analogies, and with indication to search for sources within domains provided by the experimenters. Results showed that while voluntary search yields analogical retrievals reliably, the argumentation activity seldom elicits spontaneous remindings. A second set of results demonstrated that the superficial bias can be strategically relaxed, leading to a majority of distant retrievals. Experiment 2 replicated this result with the instruction to search within domains different from that of the target, and without providing a list of specific domains. The theoretical and educational implications of these findings are discussed.
Ver más
Ver menos
Palabras Clave
ANALOGYSURFACE SIMILARITYSTRATEGIC SEARCHRETRIEVAL
Descargue o solicite el texto completo