Producción CyT
Artículo
Autoría
Fecha
2017
Editorial y Lugar de Edición
Facultad de Ciencias Sociales Universidad de Chile
Revista
Cinta de Moebio
(pp. 268-278)
- ISSN 0717-554X
Facultad de Ciencias Sociales Universidad de Chile
Facultad de Ciencias Sociales Universidad de Chile
ISSN
0717-554X
Resumen
Información suministrada por el agente en
SIGEVA
We intend to show some problems that characterize practices of production and validation of legal knowledge within juridical science. Unlike what happens in social sciences in general, between legal science and law there is a singular configuration by which the limits on knowledge and the object of knowledge are very uncertain. This singularity allows us to understand why it is so difficult for the jurists to make scientific research rather than mere comments on the law with a strong trend to p...
We intend to show some problems that characterize practices of production and validation of legal knowledge within juridical science. Unlike what happens in social sciences in general, between legal science and law there is a singular configuration by which the limits on knowledge and the object of knowledge are very uncertain. This singularity allows us to understand why it is so difficult for the jurists to make scientific research rather than mere comments on the law with a strong trend to propose institutional reforms and social interventions. In this paper, we will focus on three obstacles that contribute to explain this singularity on legal science: a lack of reflection about epistemological assumptions, identification between the juridical and positive laws and between positive laws and legal texts, and the hegemony of legal dogma in the paradigm of legal science.
Ver más
Ver menos
Palabras Clave
SUPUESTOS EPISTEMOLÓGICOSDOGMATICA JURÍDICACIENCIA JURIDICACRÍTICA
Descargue o solicite el texto completo