Producción CyT
Artículo
Autoría
TRENCH, JUAN MAXIMO
;
Olguin, Maria Valeria
;
Margni, Adrián Guillermo
;
MINERVINO, RICARDO ADRIAN
Fecha
2014
Editorial y Lugar de Edición
Taylor & Francis
Revista
Estudios de Psicología,
vol. 34
(pp. 227-232)
- ISSN 0210-9395
Taylor & Francis
Taylor & Francis
ISSN
0210-9395
Resumen
Información suministrada por el agente en
SIGEVA
In contrast to the experimental tradition in the study of analogical retrieval, naturalistic studies in which participants have to retrieve their own source analogs suggest that retrieval does not require superficial similarities. However, two important limitations of naturalistic studies concern the unknown availabilities of close vs. distant matches in long-term memory and the use of retrieval measures vulnerable to report bias. In the present study we complemented the procedure followed in n...
In contrast to the experimental tradition in the study of analogical retrieval, naturalistic studies in which participants have to retrieve their own source analogs suggest that retrieval does not require superficial similarities. However, two important limitations of naturalistic studies concern the unknown availabilities of close vs. distant matches in long-term memory and the use of retrieval measures vulnerable to report bias. In the present study we complemented the procedure followed in naturalistic studies with two additional controls: (1) a survey of naturally encoded sources available in Long-Term Memory prior to the experimental session, and (2) a measure of analogical retrieval less vulnerable to report bias. A comparison between the number of natural analogs that were available in memory and those that were retrieved during an analogy generation task demonstrated that retrieval of naturally encoded source analogs-just as retrieval of experimentally learned situations-is strongly constrained by superficial similarity.
Ver más
Ver menos
Palabras Clave
SIMILARITYRETRIEVALANALOGY
Descargue o solicite el texto completo