Producción CyT
Capítulo de Libro
Autoría
Fecha
2023
Editorial y Lugar de Edición
Hart
Libro
Transformations in Criminal Jurisdiction
(pp. 15-36)
Hart
Hart
ISBN
9781509954223
Resumen
Información suministrada por el agente en
SIGEVA
Th ere is signifi cant consensus that the fact that a given criminal wrong has been perpetrated on the territory of a particular state is a fundamental, even a decisive, reason why that state has the right to prosecute and punish the perpetrator. Th is basic insight has been captured by what is called the principle of territoriality – the core and most widely accepted rule on criminal jurisdiction under both domestic and international law. Th ere is some normative work on this principle, ...
Th ere is signifi cant consensus that the fact that a given criminal wrong has been perpetrated on the territory of a particular state is a fundamental, even a decisive, reason why that state has the right to prosecute and punish the perpetrator. Th is basic insight has been captured by what is called the principle of territoriality – the core and most widely accepted rule on criminal jurisdiction under both domestic and international law. Th ere is some normative work on this principle, albeit far less than its centrality would lead one to assume. 1 By contrast, much less attention has been paid to whether there is – and whether there should be – a presumption against extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction. Th at is, whether or when it would be pro tanto unlawful under international law for a state to prosecute and punish an off ence perpetrated extraterritorially...
Ver más
Ver menos
Palabras Clave
JurisdicciónDerechosExtraterritorialidadLibre determinación
Descargue o solicite el texto completo