Artículo
Autoría
Tavernini, Lucía Micaela
;
TRENCH, JUAN MAXIMO
;
Olguin, Maria Valeria
;
MINERVINO, RICARDO ADRIAN
Fecha
2018
Editorial y Lugar de Edición
Universidad de Palermo
Revista
Subjetividad y Procesos Cognitivos,
vol. 22
(pp. 147-165)
- ISSN 1666-244x
Universidad de Palermo
Universidad de Palermo
ISSN
1666-244x
Resumen
Información suministrada por el agente en
SIGEVA
The present study was aimed at assessing the effect of object similarities in evaluations of the quality of analogies. Two groups of participants received pairs of situations with the task of assessing the extent to which they considered them to be analogous. Whereas in the first group the relation involved in the situations to be compared was highlighted, in the second group comparisons were framed by a schema-governed category. Quality evaluations of the first group were higher when the compa...
The present study was aimed at assessing the effect of object similarities in evaluations of the quality of analogies. Two groups of participants received pairs of situations with the task of assessing the extent to which they considered them to be analogous. Whereas in the first group the relation involved in the situations to be compared was highlighted, in the second group comparisons were framed by a schema-governed category. Quality evaluations of the first group were higher when the compared situations involved taxonomically similar objects, but no such effect was found within the second group. In this group, the evaluations of the quality of analogies were affected by object similarities related to central dimensions of the framing schema-governed category. We explain these findings within an alternative perspective on analogical reasoning— the category assignment approach. Implications for this field of research are discussed.
Ver más
Ver menos
Palabras Clave
CATEGORÍA RELACIONALSIMILITUDANALOGÍA
Descargue o solicite el texto completo