Science and Technology Production
Article
Authorship
AILAN CHOKE, LORENA GISELA
;
Tavares, Luiz E. R.
;
Luque, José L.
;
Pereira, Felipe B.
Date
2020
Publishing House and Editing Place
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
Magazine
PARASITOLOGY,
vol. 147
(pp. 1752-1764)
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
Summary
Information provided by the agent in
SIGEVA
Integrative taxonomy was used to evaluate two component populations of Procamallanus (Spirocamallanus) inopinatus in Brazil and the phylogeny Camallanidae. Parasite populations were collected in the characiform Anostomoides passionis from River Xingu (Amazon basin) and Megaleporinus elongatus from River Miranda (Paraguay basin). Morphology was analysed using light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Genetic characterization was based on partial sequences of the 18S and 28S rDNA, and COI mtD...
Integrative taxonomy was used to evaluate two component populations of Procamallanus (Spirocamallanus) inopinatus in Brazil and the phylogeny Camallanidae. Parasite populations were collected in the characiform Anostomoides passionis from River Xingu (Amazon basin) and Megaleporinus elongatus from River Miranda (Paraguay basin). Morphology was analysed using light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Genetic characterization was based on partial sequences of the 18S and 28S rDNA, and COI mtDNA. Phylogenies were based on 18S and COI due to data availability. Generalized Mixed Yule Coalescent (GMYC), Poisson Tree Process (PTP) and BEAST were used for species delimitation and validation. SEM revealed for the first time the presence of minute denticles and pore-like structures surrounding the oral opening, phasmids in females and confirmed other important morphological aspects. Statistical comparison between the two-component populations indicated morphometric variations, especially among males. The different component population of P. (S.) inopinatus showed variable morphometry, but uniform morphology and were validated as conspecific by the GMYC, PTP and BEAST. Some camallanid sequences in GenBank have incorrect taxonomic labelling. Host, environment and geographic aspects seem to be related to some lineages within Camallanidae; however, their real phylogenetic meanings are still unclear.
Show more
Show less
Key Words
ENDOPARASITEMORPHOLOGYCHARACIFORMESINTEGRATIVE TAXONOMYANOSTOMIDAEHELMINTHGENETIC CHARACTERIZATIONNEMATODA
Download or request the full text